Greatest Kılavuzu C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Temel Özellikleri için

Greatest Kılavuzu C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Temel Özellikleri için

Blog Article

But yeah, I would have to agree that there's definitely a "hole" in the BCL where a read-only indexed collection interface should go. IList is just too multi-purpose.

A note. Read-only status is not transferred to other references. You cannot replace the references with other StringBuilder references or the null literal.

I was thinking about creating a new class derived from ReadOnlyCollection (class ReadOnlyMyCollection : ReadOnlyCollection or class ReadOnlyMyCollection : ReadOnlyCollection) which returns the read-only wrapper class (ReadOnlyMyItem) through the square brackets operator, but either the square brackets operator is not marked kakım virtual and the return type is not even the same or the constructor doesn't have an IList of the wrapper class (IList) to use. Should I build the class (ReadOnlyMyCollection) from scratch?

then sure, no harm will be done if you just return the collection directly. I generally try to be a bit more paranoid than that though.

A collection that is read-only is simply a collection with a wrapper that prevents modifying the collection; therefore, if changes are made to the underlying collection, the read-only collection reflects those changes.

Do S&P 500 funds run C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Kullanımı by different investment companies have different performance based on the buying / selling speed of the company? more hot questions

A ReadOnlyCollection güç support multiple readers concurrently, kakım long bey the C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Temel Özellikleri collection is not modified. Even so, enumerating through a collection is intrinsically hamiş a C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nasıl Kullanılır thread-safe procedure.

In my example I exposed it all, but C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nerelerde Kullanılıyor you don't have to do this. You sevimli make it read-only if you want, or validate additions to the list, prior to adding them.

However, it should be noted that while these read-only collection types provide a read-only view of the veri, they are only wrappers. They do hamiş provide an immutable copy of the collection.

In short: I think your question is covered with a perfectly good answer by Jon Skeet - ReadOnlyCollection or IEnumerable for exposing member collections?

C# metotları, kodun henüz organize olmasını katkısızlar, daha güdük ve elan okunabilir bir şekilde ovalmasına yardımcı olabilir ve projenize henüz okkalı mesleklevsellik kazandırır.

This implementation does derece provide a synchronized (thread safe) wrapper for a ReadOnlyCollectionBase, but derived classes emanet create their own synchronized versions of the ReadOnlyCollectionBase using the SyncRoot property.

Anlaşılabilirlik ve Kullanım Kolaylığı: C# Queue'un kolay C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nedir ve anlaşılabilir strüktürsı, geliştiricilerin katışıkşık nöbetlemleri yönetmesini kolaylaştırır.

One should note that aku's answer will only protect the list bey being read only. Elements in the list are still very writable.